We noticed you’re blocking ads

Thanks for visiting CRSTG | Europe Edition. Our advertisers are important supporters of this site, and content cannot be accessed if ad-blocking software is activated.

In order to avoid adverse performance issues with this site, please white list https://crstodayeurope.com in your ad blocker then refresh this page.

Need help? Click here for instructions.

Today's Practice | Sep 2014

How Much Astigmatism Do I Fix With Cataract Surgery?

Using a relaxed version of the Baylor toric nomogram can mitigate postoperative surprises.

Ophthalmologists managed astigmatism surgically long before the invention of toric IOLs. The combination of patients’ rising expectations, postoperative toric IOL surprises, and a rediscovered interest among cataract surgeons in the contribution of the posterior cornea to astigmatism has increased my attention to detail during the preoperative planning stage. A basic tenet is that most people (about 84%) have a steep with-the-rule (WTR) posterior corneal curvature, which effectively adds to the total corneal against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism.1 This rule clinically results in a miscalculation of the toric correction with my presumed posterior corneal fudge factor for one or two toric IOL patients of every 10 whom I am treating surgically. Moreover, this basic tenet does not include eyes with obliquely oriented anterior corneal astigmatism. To date, information on the accuracy of corneal tomography for assessing posterior corneal astigmatism is scarce. It is my understanding, however, that at least one ophthalmic company is developing software to fine-tune the assessment of posterior corneal astigmatism magnitude and meridian. There is evidence to support that intraoperative aberrometry can improve outcomes with ocular toricity management during refractive cataract surgery,2 but no head-to-head studies have been performed that compare the accuracy of astigmatic correction using the Baylor toric nomogram (Figure 1) versus intraoperative aberrometry or tomography.

My approach to managing corneal astigmatism is a relaxed variation on the Baylor toric nomogram, which has mitigated but, as noted earlier, not eliminated postoperative surprises. Hayashi et al demonstrated that anterior corneal astigmatism drifts approximately 0.34 D from WTR to ATR over time3 which I take into consideration, especially for patients 65 years of age or younger. The corneas of older patients have likely completed most of the drifting, so my goal is to leave them with minimal or neutralized WTR astigmatism.

Posterior corneal astigmatism is approximately 0.30 to 0.40 D WTR in most patients with anterior WTR astigmatism and approximately 0.20 D WTR in most patients with anterior ATR astigmatism.4 Because I have been so concerned about flipping the axis in my WTR patients because of the posterior corneal astigmatism, I have often grossly undercorrected the WTR astigmatism in these cases. This may occur for any number of reasons. First, the actual amount of the posterior corneal astigmatism is unclear, and, second, there is the 16% possibility that the patient may be part of the minority of patients who actually have preexisting ATR posterior corneal astigmatism, which would increase the amount of total WTR astigmatism that the patient has. Also, I purposely tried to leave the patient with residual WTR astigmatism of approximately 0.30 D to account for the natural corneal drift. Last, any little malrotation can further reduce my intended astigmatic correction. Thus, I now use toric IOLs in eyes that have at least 1.40 D of WTR astigmatism, instead of 1.70 D per the Baylor nomogram, and, as mentioned earlier, I aim to neutralize the astigmatism fully rather than leave them with WTR cylinder, especially in older eyes.

One other optical property that I take into consideration, which is still an unclear science, is the contribution of the effective lens position. In shorter eyes (<22 mm), the IOL often sits more anteriorly, resulting in a stronger toric correction, and thus I will choose a lower toric power.

Conversly, I will choose a higher toric power in eyes that have a longer axial length (>26 mm), especially if the amount of astigmatism is between two toric powers.

All of the subtle differences I described make it challenging at times to choose the correct toric IOL power. I use various tools to help with my decision. To determine the toric correction, I start with at least two similar anterior corneal keratometry readings (topography, optical biometry, manual keratometry), review the cylindrical magnitude and axis in the patient’s spectacles, and account for the patient’s age and axial length. Ultimately, I look forward to software updates and new devices that will ascertain total corneal astigmatism more accurately

The question I pose is this: How do you measure corneal astigmatism to determine a toric IOL power calculation?

Elizabeth Yeu, MD, is in private practice at Virginia Eye Consultants and an Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology at Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk, Virginia. Dr. Yeu may be reached at e-mail: eyeu@vec2020.com.

  1. Koch DD, Ali SF, Weikert MP, et al. Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(12):2080-2087.
  2. Krueger RR, Shea W, Zhou Y, et al. Intraoperative, real-time aberrometry during refractive cataract surgery with a sequentially shifting wavefront device. J Refract Surg. 2013 Sep;29(9):630-635.
  3. Hayashi K, Hirata A, Manabe S, Hayashi H. Long-term change in corneal astigmatism after sutureless cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(5):858-865.
  4. Koch DD, Ali SF, Weikert MP, et al. Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Dec;38(12):2080-2087.