The Role of Anterior Segment OCT in MIGS

Anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) has become invaluable for the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. First-generation instruments offered time-domain and spectral-domain OCT. Newer-generation swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) employs a longer wavelength of light (1,310 nm) and higher scan speeds (up to 100,000 A-scans per second) to provide improved axial resolution (5 µm). Currently available SS-OCT instruments include the Casia2 (Tomey), Anterion (Heidelberg Engineering), and Triton DRI (Topcon).

Its ability to image the angle, Schlemm canal, and trabecular meshwork gives AS-OCT a role in MIGS.¹

THE PERIOPERATIVE UTILITY OF AS-OCT

Preoperative Evaluation

A comprehensive preoperative evaluation of the anterior segment is critical for identifying patients with an open angle who are suitable candidates for MIGS. The ability of AS-OCT to provide precise cross-sectional imaging of the angle facilitates the detection of structural variations in conjunction with traditional gonioscopy. AS-OCT can detect narrow angles, iridotrabecular contact, and areas of peripheral anterior synechiae. The newer-generation AS-OCT modalities use swept-source technology, giving them heightened sensitivity to detect even subtle anatomic abnormalities. The technology’s precision occasionally leads to overdiagnosis, however, making the careful interpretation of findings essential.²

Intraoperative Adjustments

AS-OCT has revolutionized MIGS by enabling real-time intraoperative imaging. With instruments such as the Artevo 800 (Carl Zeiss Meditec), surgeons can confirm an implant’s position and make immediate adjustments as needed. This precision reduces the likelihood of malpositioned devices, which can compromise surgical efficacy and postoperative IOP control. Repositioning devices during surgery reduces the risk of failed procedures.

A study found that intraoperative OCT allowed real-time visualization of an overimplanted iStent (Glaukos), with the flange observed to be flush against the trabecular meshwork.³ The same study described intraoperative OCT signs of an optimally placed Hydrus Microstent (Alcon). Specifically, the absence of the tram-track and knuckle signs indicated incorrect device positioning.

Postoperative Outcomes

AS-OCT can evaluate MIGS outcomes. In a prospective analysis, the protrusion of an iStent was associated with lower postoperative IOP compared to overimplanted devices.⁴

AS-OCT has also been used to evaluate the trabeculotomy opening size following Trabectome (MicroSurgical Technology) surgery. One study found no correlation between opening size and IOP reduction.⁵

In Liverpool, United Kingdom, AS-OCT has been used postoperatively to confirm the presence of and evaluate pores created in the trabecular meshwork with an excimer laser trabeculotomy (Elios, Elios Vision; Figure 1).

All the aforementioned findings highlight the potential of AS-OCT to investigate whether specific structural changes achieved during surgery are predictive of clinical success.

In the postoperative setting, AS-OCT can be used to track gradual anatomic changes over time. This is particularly helpful for monitoring implant performance. For instance, AS-OCT can determine if a suprachoroidal implant is correctly positioned in the anterior chamber and monitor the size of the distal suprachoroidal space in correlation with clinical outcomes (Figure 2).