We noticed you’re blocking ads

Thanks for visiting CRSTEurope. Our advertisers are important supporters of this site, and content cannot be accessed if ad-blocking software is activated.

In order to avoid adverse performance issues with this site, please white list https://crstodayeurope.com in your ad blocker then refresh this page.

Need help? Click here for instructions.

Refractive Surgery | May 2011

FEATURE STORY: Astigmatism Management: Centration Techniques

The Amaris Total-Tech laser tracks six types of eye movements to compensate for static and dynamic conditions during laser corneal ablation.

Human eyes are capable of six types of movement: x/y lateral shifts, z levelling, horizontal and vertical rotations, and cyclotorsion (rotation around the optical axis). Current laser technology for refractive surgery creates corneal alterations to correct refractive errors more accurately than in the past.1 Ablation profiles are based on the removal of tissue lenticules through sequential laser pulses that ablate a small amount of corneal tissue to compensate for refractive errors. However, the quality of vision after laser refractive surgery can deteriorate significantly, especially under mesopic and low-contrast conditions.2

The induction of optical aberrations, such as spherical aberration and coma, are related to loss of visual acuity and quality.3 To balance existing aberrations, customized treatments have been developed using either wavefront measurements of the whole eye4 obtained with Hartmann- Shack wavefront sensors5 or corneal topography-derived wavefront analysis.6,7 Topography-guided,8 wavefront-driven, 9 wavefront-optimized,10 asphericity-preserving, and Q-factor-based11 profiles have been advanced as solutions to address aberrations.

Schwiegerling and Snyder measured eye motion in patients undergoing LASIK using a video technique to determine centration and variance of the position of the eye during surgery. They found a standard deviation in eye movements in all eyes of greater than 100 μm.12 Taylor et al determined the accuracy of an eye-tracking system designed for laser refractive surgery;13 the system demonstrated an accuracy of 60 μm for an intact cornea and 100 μm for a cornea with a thin flap removed.

Bueeler et al investigated the lateral alignment accuracy needed in wavefront-guided refractive surgery to improve the optics to a desired level in a percentage of normally aberrated eyes.14 To achieve the diffraction limit in 95% of normal eyes with a 7-mm pupil, a lateral alignment accuracy of 70 μm or better was required. An accuracy of 200 μm was sufficient to reach the same goal with a 3-mm pupil.

Bueeler and Mrochen quantified the parallax error associated with localizing corneal positions by tracking the subjacent entrance pupil center by means of optical ray tracing in a schematic model eye.15 They found that tracking error can amount to 30% of the detected lateral shift (or more for eye trackers mounted closer than 500 mm to the eye). Thus, if the eye tracker registers a lateral shift of the entrance pupil of 200 μm away from the tracking reference axis, the point of interest located on the cornea would essentially be 260 μm away from this reference axis. A laser pulse fired at that moment would be systematically displaced by 60 μm.

Measuring rotation when the patient is upright16 but performing the refractive treatment when the patient is supine may lead to ocular cyclotorsion,17,18 resulting in mismatching of the applied versus the intended profiles. 19,20 Recent technologies, such as the Amaris Total- Tech laser (Schwind eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany), can facilitate measurement of and potentially compensate for static cyclotorsion that occurs when the patient moves from the upright to the supine position during the procedure21 by quantifying the cyclorotation occurring between wavefront measurement and laser refractive surgery22 and compensating for it.23-25 Further, measuring and compensating for ocular cyclotorsion during refractive treatments with the patient supine may reduce optical noise of the applied versus the intended profiles.26-28

Although many studies have discussed the implications of ocular cyclotorsion, they often do not pay attention to the rolling and axial movements of the eye. The Total-Tech laser takes all of these factors into account (Figure 1).

DIMENSIONS OF EYE MOVEMENT

Lateral movements during ablation (first and second dimensions). The eye tracking system of the Amaris Total-Tech laser includes a number of modules to keep track of different types of eye movements. In a pupil-registration module for the eye-tracker subsystem, the first pupil image obtained by the Amaris system when the ablation begins is taken as a reference, and its location in reference to the limbus is used for any further eye-tracker image in order to determine the pupil center shift compensation.

Eye rolling during ablation (third and fourth dimensions). In the scleral-registration module for the eyetracker subsystem, the first few scleral-tracker images obtained when the ablation begins are taken as reference for natural rolling and compared to any further scleral-tracker image to determine eye rolling.

Static cyclotorsion between upright and supine positions (fifth dimension). In the eye-registration module for the eye-tracker subsystem, the diagnostic image is used as a reference and compared to an eyetracker image obtained by the Amaris system before ablation begins in order to determine the static cyclotorsion component.

Dynamic cyclotorsion during ablation (fifth dimension). In the eye-registration module for the eye-tracker subsystem, the first eye-tracker image obtained by the Amaris system after ablation begins is taken as reference and compared to any further eye-tracker image in order to determine the dynamic cyclotorsion component (DCC).

Axial displacement during ablation (sixth dimension). The scleral-registration module for the eye-tracker subsystem also uses the first few scleral-tracker images obtained after ablation begins as reference for the natural level; this is compared with any further scleral-tracker images to determine axial displacement.

COMPENSATION FOR OCULAR CYCLOTORSIONS

Using these measurements, the Amaris Total-Tech laser compensates for any ocular cyclotorsions that occur from the upright to supine position (static cyclotorsion from diagnosis to treatment), as well as lateral movement, eye rolling, dynamic cyclotorsion, and displacements along the propagation axis that happen during laser treatment. Additionally, the Total-Tech laser compensates for differences in pupil size and pupil center during treatment compared with measurements at the time of diagnosis29 because the theoretical impact of cyclorotated ablations is smaller than those of decentred ablations or edge effects30 (coma and spherical aberration31). In this way, additional lateral displacements30 due to cyclotorsions that occur around any position other than the ablation center are avoided. (Induced aberrations emanating from lateral displacements32 always increase with decentration.33)

EYE TRACKING IN SIX DIMENSIONS

A six-dimensional eye-tracker is important because uncompensated movements can result in unwanted aberrations. Uncompensated lateral pupil movements induce decentrations12 that can manifest as coma-like aberrations (Figure 2).32 Uncompensated rolling movements also induce decentrations15 that can manifest as coma-like aberrations.32 Uncompensated cyclotorsional movements can induce aberrations,20 whereas uncompensated axial movements can induce asymmetrical undercorrections (Figure 3). Axial movements can result in laser spots that are no longer in focus when they reach the cornea, reducing the radiant exposure and the ablation depth of the spot. Axial movements can also produce pulses that hit the cornea more centrally than planned if the eye moves towards the laser system and more peripherally if the eye moves away from the laser.

RESULTS

In our experience, the average pupil displacement as measured with the Amaris system was 150 μm. Three percent of eyes had pupil displacements exceeding 1 mm. The range of pupil displacements over the treatment was relatively mild, with peaks of about 1.5 mm.

The average amount of rolling movement was 5°. This value happens to be the most commonly accepted value for natural rolling, measured as angle alpha,34 lambda,35 or kappa.36 In 3% of eyes, rolling exceeded 8°. The range of rolling movements over the treatment were relatively mild, with peaks of up to about 10°.

The average static cyclotorsional error was 1°, which was lower than the observations of Ciccio et al, who reported 4° (Figure 4).37 In 3% of eyes, cyclotorsion exceeded 8°.

The mean DCC values over the treatment were relatively small, but with peaks of up to approximately 57deg;. Considering that the average cyclotorsion from the upright to the supine position is about ±4°,37 it is not enough to compensate only for the static cyclotorsion without considering the dynamic cyclotorsion during the laser procedure. The effects of the DCC can be considered as optical noise of the applied versus the intended profiles.38

Without eye registration technologies,39,40 considering that maximum cyclotorsion measured between the upright and supine positions does not exceed ±14°,37 this explains why classical spherocylindrical corrections in refractive surgery succeed without major cyclotorsional considerations. However, only limited amounts of astigmatism can effectively be corrected with this amount of cyclotorsional error.20

Currently available eye registration technologies, which provide an accuracy of about 1° and measure static and dynamic cyclotorsion components, have introduced a new era in corneal laser refractive surgery because patients may be treated for a wider range of refractive problems with enhanced success. High-resolution ablation systems are also required.41,42

Measuring axial movement, we obtained an average of -300 μm. This negative value, which is fairly low, means that some patients push their head back at the beginning of the treatment and return closer to level during treatment. In 10% of eyes, axial movements exceeded 1 mm. The range of axial movements over the treatment were relatively mild, with peaks exceeding 1 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience of over 8,000 eyes treated with the Amaris Total-Tech laser, 91% of treatments resulted in a postoperative cylinder within 0.50 D of target, and 19% of eyes gained lines of BCVA from baseline. From the minor induction of aberrations, it can be inferred that mesopic and low-contrast visual acuity have maintained their best corrected preoperative levels. More clinical data are required to accurately gauge how much improvement can be expected from the use of this technology.

We have found that the Total-Tech laser’s sixdimensional eye-tracker yields excellent outcomes that are safe and predictable. Refractions are reduced to subclinical values, with 70% of eyes achieving within ±0.25 D of emmetropia and 19% gaining lines of BCVA (mean postoperative defocus, -0.12 ±0.17 D; astigmatism, 0.15 ±0.25 D). Rate of registration is greater than 90% for cyclotorsion and greater than 80% for rolling and axial movements. Mean rolling was within ±5deg; in 52% of cases, dynamic rolling was within ±5deg; in 66% of cases, static cyclotorsion was within ±4deg; in 69% of cases, dynamic cyclotorsion was within ±27deg; in 72% of cases, and z-movement was within ±0.5 mm in 69% of cases.

Six-dimensional movements of the eye can be effectively measured, and these measurements can be used to compensate for both static and dynamic conditions during laser corneal ablation with the Amaris Total-Tech laser.

Maria Clara Arbelaez, MD, practices at the Muscat Eye Laser Center, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. Dr. Arbelaez states that she has received travel fees from Schwind eye-tech-solutions. She may be reached at tel: +96824691414; fax: +96824601212; e-mail: drmaria@omantel.net.om.

Samuel Arba-Mosquera, MSc, is an Optical/Visual Researcher at Schwind eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany. Mr. Arba-Mosquera may be reached at tel: +49 6027 508 274; fax: +49 6027 508 520; e-mail: samuel.arba.mosquera@eye-tech.net.

  1. Munnerlyn CR,Koons SJ,Marshall J.Photorefractive keratectomy:a technique for laser refractive surgery.J Cataract Refract Surg.1988;14(1):46-52.
  2. Mastropasqua L,Toto L,Zuppardi E,et al.Photorefractive keratectomy with aspheric profile of ablation versus conventional photorefractive keratectomy for myopia correction:six-month controlled clinical trial.J Cataract Refract Surg.2006;32(1):109-116.
  3. Applegate RA,Howland HC.Refractive surgery,optical aberrations,and visual performance.J Refract Surg. 1997;13(3):295-299.
  4. Thibos L,Bradley A,Applegate R.Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations.J Vis. 2004;4(4):329-351.
  5. Liang J,Grimm B,Goelz S,Bille JF.Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor.J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis.1994;11(7):1949-1957.
  6. Salmon TO.Corneal contribution to the wavefront aberration of the eye.PhD dissertation;1999:70.
  7. Mrochen M,Jankov M,Bueeler M,et al.Correlation between corneal and total wavefront aberrations in myopic eyes.J Refract Surg.2003;19(2):104-112.
  8. Alio JL,Belda JI,Osman AA,et al.Topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (TOPOLINK) to correct irregular astigmatism after previous refractive surgery. J Refract Surg.2003;19(5):516-527.
  9. Mrochen M,Kaemmerer M,Seiler T.Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery.J Cataract Refract Surg.2001;27(2):201-207.
  10. Mrochen M,Donetzky C,Wüllner C,et al.Wavefront-optimized ablation profiles:Theoretical background.J Cataract Refract Surg.2004;30(4):775-785.
  11. Koller T,Iseli HP,Hafezi F,et al.Q-factor customized ablation profile for the correction of myopic astigmatism.J Cataract Refract Surg.2006;32(4):584-589.
  12. Schwiegerling J,Snyder RW.Eye movement during laser in situ keratomileusis.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(3):345-351.
  13. Taylor NM,Eikelboom RH,van Sarloos PP,et al.Determining the accuracy of an eye tracking system for laser refractive surgery.J Refract Surg.2000;16(5):S643-S646.
  14. Bueeler M,Mrochen M,Seiler T.Maximum permissible lateral decentration in aberration-sensing and wavefrontguided corneal ablation.J Cataract Refract Surg.2003;29(2):257-263.
  15. Bueeler M,Mrochen M.Limitations of pupil tracking in refractive surgery:systematic error in determination of corneal locations.J Refract Surg.2004;20(4):371-378.
  16. Buehren T,Lee BJ,Collins MJ,et al.Ocular microfluctuations and videokeratoscopy.Cornea.2002;21(4):346-351.
  17. Smith EM Jr,Talamo JH,Assil KK,et al.Comparison of astigmatic axis in the seated and supine positions.J Refract Corneal Surg.1994;10(6):615-620.
  18. Smith EM Jr,Talamo JH.Cyclotorsion in the seated and the supine patient.J Cataract Refract Surg.1995;21(4):402-403.
  19. Bueeler M,Mrochen M,Seiler T.Maximum permissible torsional misalignment in aberration-sensing and wavefront- guided corneal ablation. J Cataract Refract Surg.2004;30(1):17-25.
  20. Arba-Mosquera S,Merayo-Lloves J,de Ortueta D.Clinical effects of pure cyclotorsional errors during refractive surgery.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2008;49(11):4828-4836.
  21. Chernyak DA.From wavefront device to laser:an alignment method for complete registration of the ablation to the cornea.J Refract Surg.2005;21(5):463-468.
  22. Chernyak DA.Cyclotorsional eye motion occurring between wavefront measurement and refractive surgery.J Cataract Refract Surg.2004;30(3):633-638.
  23. Bharti S,Bains HS.Active cyclotorsion error correction during LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism with the NIDEK EC-5000 CX III laser.J Refract Surg.2007;23(9):S1041-S1045.
  24. Kim H,Joo CK.Ocular cyclotorsion according to body position and flap creation before laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg.2008;34(4):557-561.
  25. Park SH,Kim M,Joo CK.Measurement of pupil centroid shift and cyclotorsional displacement using iris registration. Ophthalmologica.2009;223(3):166-171.
  26. Porter J,Yoon G,MacRae S,et al.Surgeon offsets and dynamic eye movements in laser refractive surgery.J Cataract Refract Surg.2005;31(11):2058-2066.
  27. Hori-Komai Y,Sakai C,Toda I,Ito M,Yamamoto T,Tsubota K.Detection of cyclotorsional rotation during excimer laser ablation in LASIK.J Refract Surg.2007;23(9):911-915.
  28. Chang J.Cyclotorsion during laser in situ keratomileusis.J Cataract Refract Surg.2008;34(10):1720-1726.
  29. Yang Y,Thompson K,Burns S.Pupil location under mesopic,photopic and pharmacologically dilated conditions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2002;43(7):2508-2512.
  30. Marcos S,Barbero S,Llorente L,et al.Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2001;42(13):3349-3356.
  31. Marcos S.Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction.J Refract Surg. 2001;17(5):S596-S601.
  32. Guirao A,Williams D,Cox I.Effect of rotation and translation on the expected benefit of an ideal method to correct the eyes higher-order aberrations.J Opt Soc Am A.2001;18(5):1003-1015.
  33. Uozato H,Guyton DL.Centering corneal surgical procedures.Am J Ophthalmol.1987;103(3 Pt 1):264-275.
  34. Dunne MC,Misson GP,White EK,et al.Peripheral astigmatic asymmetry and angle alpha.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993;13(3):303-305.
  35. Salmon TO,Thibos LN.Videokeratoscope-line-of-sight misalignment and its effect on measurements of corneal and internal ocular aberrations.J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis.2002;19(4):657-669.
  36. Hashemi H,Khabazkhoob M,Yazdani K,Mehravaran S,Jafarzadehpur E,Fotouhi A.Distribution of angle kappa measurements with Orbscan II in a population-based survey.J Refract Surg.2010;28:1-6.
  37. Ciccio AE,Durrie DS,Stahl JE,et al.Ocular cyclotorsion during customized laser ablation.J Refract Surg. 2005;21(6):S772-S774.
  38. Bueeler M,Mrochen M.Simulation of eye-tracker latency,spot size,and ablation pulse depth on the correction of higher order wavefront aberrations with scanning spot laser systems.J Refract Surg.2005;21(1):28-36.
  39. Chernyak DA.Iris-based cyclotorsional image alignment method for wavefront registration.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.2005;52:2032-2340.
  40. Schruender S,Fuchs H,Spasovski S,et al.Intraoperative corneal topography for image registration.J Refract Surg. 2002;18(5):S624-S629.
  41. Huang D,Arif M.Spot size and quality of scanning laser correction of higher-order wavefront aberrations.J Cataract Refract Surg.2002;28(3):407-416.
  42. Guirao A,Williams D,MacRae S.Effect of beam size on the expected benefit of customized laser refractive surgery. J Refract Surg.2003;19(1):15-23.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

 

 

  • The Total-Tech laser can facilitate measurement of and compensate for static cyclotorsion that occurs when patients move from the upright to the supine position.
  • Measurements of the six-dimensional movements of the eye can be used to compensate for both static and dynamic conditions during laser corneal ablation.

NEXT IN THIS ISSUE