We noticed you’re blocking ads

Thanks for visiting CRSTG | Europe Edition. Our advertisers are important supporters of this site, and content cannot be accessed if ad-blocking software is activated.

In order to avoid adverse performance issues with this site, please white list https://crstodayeurope.com in your ad blocker then refresh this page.

Need help? Click here for instructions.

Refractive Surgery | Apr 2010

High-Definition Wavefront Aberrometry to Measure Accommodation

Device can be used for pseudophakic IOL measurements of accommodation.

Surgeons are well aware of the benefits of wavefront aberrometry in determining the eye's overall refractive power error. Not only does this technology provide a detailed map of the eye, but it can help detect biomechanical problems such as corneal striae, scarring, and incipient and advanced keratoconus. Studies have recently been conducted to investigate the use of wavefront aberrometry in a new function: testing accommodation in young and presbyopic phakic patients.

William B. Trattler, MD, of the Center For Excellence in Eye Care in Miami, presented results of a prospective study that included 10 young phakic adults and 10 phakic patients with presbyopia at the recent Second International Society of Presbyopia, held just before the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons meeting in Barcelona, Spain.1 Dr. Trattler and colleagues used the Complete Ophthalmic Analysis System (COASHD Model 2800; AMO Wavefront Sciences LLC, Albuquerque, New Mexico) to evaluate accommodation as a measurement of refractive change recorded at 30 Hz. The measurement took 9.9 seconds and included wavefront, refraction, and pupil size using internal and external targets. A dynamically controllable near target was used to stimulate the eye, and simultaneous measurements of refraction and higher-order aberrations were recorded to identify true optical power change. This measurement was then compared with depth of focus and other changes due to pupil size or aberrations.

As expected, little to no accommodation was observed in patients with presbyopia. However, a successful quantitative measurement of optical accommodation was possible in phakic eyes, and a distinction was made between true accommodation and depth of focus and changes in spherical aberration or pupil size. These measurements of accommodation are in keeping with previously published results.

Initially, phakic patients between the ages of 22 and 51 years were studied. Following are two case examples of patients' accommodative measurements with the COASHD. Case No. 1 is a 30-year-old phakic patient, and case No. 2 is a 38-year-old patient who had been experiencing a reduction in accommodation.

Case No. 1. This 30-year-old patient had an accommodative range of 4.25 D. At 6 m (far target), his accommodation was 0.17 D; a -6.00 D target change occurred at 3 seconds and 0.00 D at 6 seconds. His overall stimulus was 5.75 D.

Case No. 2.This 38-year-old patient had an accommodative range of 1.75 D after an overall stimulus of 3.00 D.

Objective accommodation was measured repeatedly with the dynamic wavefront aberrometer and found to have a reproducibility of 0.31 D. After confirming that the COAS-HD system could accurately measure accommodation in phakic patients, it was determined that the findings followed previously published accommodation age curves. Further analysis with wavefront aberrometry also found that spherical aberration in particular was responsible for 17% of the accommodation effect.

More recently, the COAS-HD was used to compare dynamic measurements of accommodation in patients with bilateral Crystalens HD (Bausch + Lomb, Rochester, New York), Tetraflex (Lenstec, St. Petersburg, Florida), and Tecnis 1-Piece (Abbott Medical Optics Inc., Santa Ana, California) IOLs. In this study group, eight eyes were measured using the previously described protocol.

These results determined that pseudophakic eyes had little objective accommodation. There was no significant difference in accommodative effect between the accommodating IOLs (Crystalens HD or Tetraflex) and the standard IOL (Tecnis 1-Piece). Isolated pseudophakic individuals in each group showed some accommodative effect. However, when the contribution of spherical aberration was removed, there was no significant accommodation measurement.

Accommodation involves contraction of the ciliary body and notable changes in the lens shape and lenticular refractive index. We can compensate for loss of accommodation in patients with presbyopia by prescribing glasses and contact lenses or turning to surgical interventions such as monovision, implantation of multifocal or accommodating IOLs, or presbyopic laser vision correction. These strategies do not replace the natural accommodation process and, as is the case with current accommodating IOLs, may not work as well as one would hope. However, there is hope on the horizon with newer accommodating IOL models.

The COAS-HD wavefront aberrometer is a promising strategy for determining the degree of accommodation in pseudophakic patients with either an implanted monofocal or accommodating IOL.

George H.H. Beiko, BM, BCH, FRCSC, is an Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology at McMaster University and a Lecturer at the University of Toronto, Canada. Dr. Beiko states that he is a consultant to Abbott Medical Optics Inc., and receives research funds from Lenstec and Visiogen Inc. He may be reached at e-mail: george.beiko@sympatico.ca.